Skip to main content

Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage (CCUS)

As Scotland’s environmental regulator, we are responsible for some of the primary environmental legislation that covers Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage (CCUS), and have statutory duties within the land use planning system and local air quality management system. We are also involved in working with UK and Scottish governments as well as other environment agencies. In addition, we provide advice to and have regular interactions with academia, industry and the general public. 

Please see the following sections for more information:

Background

CCUS refers to a variety of techniques that capture Carbon Dioxide (CO2) from flue gases, process emissions or the atmosphere for use, to make products or permanent storage underground.

The whole process involves one or more of three parts:

  • CO2 capture - from a large point source, such as a power station, other industrial installation, or directly separated from the air.
  • CO2 transportation – by pipeline or ship.
  • CO2 storage - in underground geological formations or used to make products and materials.

For further information, please visit the International Energy Agency and the UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre webpages.

Implementation in the UK

At present, several CCUS projects are in development across the UK. The UK government is supporting CCUS deployment via a cluster sequencing approach. To date two clusters in England have been supported in the first phase of funding. A further two clusters are being supported in the second wave of funding, one of which is in Scotland - the Acorn project which aims to store CO2 in a depleted oil field in the North Sea. See links below for projects related to the Acorn CCS project:

  • The Acorn Project at St. Fergus in Aberdeenshire, aims to capture CO2 from combustion plant in the St Fergus gas terminal and will build the transport and storage network to facilitate geological storage of the CO2.
  • Peterhead CCS Project at Peterhead gas-fired power station, in Aberdeenshire. The project aims to capture CO2 from combustion of power station's fuel and send it for geological storage at the Acorn project's geological storage site.

SEPA is a statutory consultee in the planning process and has responded to the Peterhead CCS Project planning application. The Peterhead CCS project proposes to use an amine-based post-combustion carbon capture technology to capture CO2 from the exhaust of a new gas turbine. The activity of carbon capture is regulated by us, primarily through Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Regulations 2012 and the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS).

For an overview of CCS projects around the world, please see the global map provided by the Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage research group.

Environmental Regulation of CCUS

SEPA is one of the regulators in a full chain CCUS project. SEPA is responsible for regulation relating to the protection of the environment and human health.

In England and Wales the environmental regulators with similar roles to ours are the Environmental Agency and Natural Resources Wales, respectively. The primary environmental legislation under which we will regulate carbon capture activities is outlined below:

  • We regulate the operators of installations which emit CO2 whilst carrying out activities specified in the Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Regulations 2012 (known as PPC 2012).
  • Carbon capture for the purposes of geological storage is a listed activity under the PPC Regulations. This means operators of plant capturing CO2 from a PPC activity for geological storage will require a PPC permit. While carbon capture for utilisation is not a listed activity in PPC 2012, if it is connected to an activity listed in PPC 2012 (i.e. capturing CO2 from flue gases from a listed activity), then it would be permitted as a Directly Associated activity (DAA). Guidance on PPC regulations is available on the SEPA website.
  • The Water Environment (Controlled Activities) (Scotland) Regulations 2011 (known as CAR) require operators of activities likely to have an impact on the water environment to be authorised by SEPA.
  • We are a statutory consultee to the environmental impact assessment (EIA) conducted on major planning applications, including applications for consent submitted under the Electricity Act 1989. We engage in the EIA and planning processes at an early stage in order to address potential environmental issues.
  • We review local air quality management plans, and consider how emissions from regulated installations affect UK Air Quality Standards.
  • We will provide advice to Scottish Government as to whether a proposed new power station has met the requirements of the carbon capture readiness guidance provided by the Scottish Government in demonstrating that there is adequate space for carbon capture and that there are no barriers to retrofitting carbon capture equipment in the future.
  • We are the competent authority for the UK Emissions Trading System (UK ETS) in Scotland. We issue permits to eligible installations and ensure that operators comply with the system’s operational rules. CO2 captured and stored will be considered as ‘not emitted’ under the EU ETS.
  • The presence of dangerous substances has the potential to bring some installations not previously subject to the Control Of Major Accident Hazard Regulations 2015 (COMAH) within the scope of that regime. At non-nuclear sites in Scotland, SEPA and the HSE are the COMAH Competent Authority. At nuclear sites in Scotland, SEPA and the Office of Nuclear Regulation (ONR) are the COMAH Competent Authority.

Environmental impacts of amine-based post-combustion carbon capture technology

The proposed technology for both the Peterhead CCS Project and Acorn CCS project is an amine-based post-combustion carbon capture process. This technology is in use at the world’s first commercial scale CCS project at the Boundary Dam power station in Saskatchewan, Canada which began commissioning in October 2014.

Review of amine emissions from carbon capture systems, reviews the emission of amines (and related amine reaction products) from post combustion carbon capture systems, their potential effects and considers the development of effective environmental standards.

The paper considers four main aspects:

  • emissions of amines and associated reaction products;
  • the potential impact of such emissions on the environment and on human health;
  • the extent of relevant environmental quality standards;
  • issues associated with measurement of such compounds at low concentrations in emissions and in the environment.

This document was originally prepared in the latter half of 2014 and developed through to the end of 2014. We are aware that further detailed technical information on emissions of amine compounds from carbon capture systems has been, or is now in the process of, being published.

The UK government published guidance “Post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: emerging techniques”. This guidance for emerging techniques is not a regulatory requirement but identifies best practice to address important environmental issues.

Frequently Asked Questions

So far, we know CCS plant can achieve capture of ~95% of carbon dioxide in flue gases. This leaves 5% of carbon emissions that will need offsetting in order to meet net-zero GHG emissions. The technology is developing so this could change or depend on the composition of the flue gas the CCS plant processes.

The climate change committee (CCC), an independent statutory body established to advise the UK governments on climate change, say carbon capture is an essential component of the UK’s decarbonisation journey. However, it is not the only technology needed to decarbonise our whole economy. More information about decarbonisation and the role of CCUS can be found the CCC’s 6th carbon budget for the UK and the Scottish Emissions Targets – 2022 five yearly review.

Currently it is more likely CCS will be appropriate for industrial operations with significant carbon dioxide emissions. This is because the process require energy to run and also the carbon dioxide needs to be gathered and transported to an underground storage location. For other sources of GHG gases, like home boilers or cars, different solutions will likely be needed to meet net-zero GHG emissions.

Environmental regulations are in place to protect the environment and human health, so the impact of any potentially polluting substances used in a CCS plant will be managed via the PPC permit. This can include limits on emissions to air, land and water, it may also include requirements to used best available techniques to manage any impacts to an acceptable level for human health and the wider environment.

Yes, direct air storage is a type of CCUS. Rather than separating CO2 from a flue gas or process emissions as in industrial CCS, direct air capture separates CO2 from the air. The proportion of carbon dioxide in air is much less then in flue gases or process emissions, so direct air capture usually needs more energy and more space than industrial CCUS applications.

Ultimately, to have the most benefit to our climate the carbon dioxide should be stored (not emitted to the atmosphere) permanently. Some type of utilisation only temporarily avoids emitting the carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. While this might displace another source of CO2 it might also create a demand (and therefore increase emissions of CO2) so utilisation needs to be considered very carefully before we can confidently say it could contribute to delivering GHG emissions reductions.